Optimising VR Training: Avoid These 4 Common Mistakes

Virtual Reality (VR) training is poised at the forefront of innovative learning methodologies, promising immersive experiences that can revolutionise skill development and knowledge retention. However, the allure of this cutting-edge technology often leads to certain misconceptions and missteps in its implementation. Let’s explore four critical mistakes frequently encountered when designing VR training programs and delve into the best practices to ensure their effectiveness.

1. Neglecting Clear Learning Objectives

The misconception that VR technology alone can resolve broader learning challenges is a prevalent oversight in designing VR training. Many programs focus solely on high-level training objectives without establishing clear learning goals.

For organizations seeking to maximize training impact, creating learner-centric VR programs demands a focus on precise learning objectives. While crafting a virtual simulation might offer an enjoyable experience, the true value lies in developing programs that yield measurable results for the organisation.

Narrowing down learning objectives involves identifying the root causes of issues faced by learners. Whether it’s enhancing speed, proficiency, or safety, VR training should target specific areas for improvement. By closely examining the reasons behind these objectives, organisations can tailor VR programs to address skill deficits effectively. This attention to detail enables the tracking of meaningful training metrics, gauging the success of VR initiatives.

Scenario 1:
Consider the case of addressing safe lifting practices in a warehouse setting. A common mistake involves designing a VR program that replicates the warehouse environment without specifically addressing skill deficits. On the contrary, a best practice approach involves crafting scenarios within the VR training that pinpoint and correct learner mistakes, such as incorrect lifting techniques. This method directly aligns with the broader objective of reducing injury rates by focusing on skill enhancement and performance measurement.

2. Assuming VR Suits All Training Needs

Another common misstep is assuming that all training content seamlessly translates to VR. Not every training module that works in eLearning or instructor-led sessions will thrive in a VR environment. VR excels when training involves physical tasks or critical thinking.

Transitioning existing eLearning content directly to VR without adaptation diminishes the effectiveness of VR’s immersive potential. VR thrives on action-based learning, making heavy text and dialogue less engaging in this medium.

Scenario 2:
Imagine attempting to revamp an onboarding program by transplanting all training content into a VR format. Unfortunately, this approach overwhelms learners with an excess of information, failing to harness the immersive capabilities of VR. Instead, an optimal strategy blends traditional instruction with VR elements. For instance, new hires could experience a VR tour of the manufacturing facility, enabling them to interact with the process of product creation while receiving fundamental and compliance information through other modes.

3. Limited Collaboration in Development

Effective VR training program development requires robust collaboration among all stakeholders, especially in the initial design phase. Waiting too long to involve key contributors often leads to disconnection and inefficiencies.

Engaging all relevant parties, including subject matter experts (SMEs), leadership, and stakeholders, during the project’s conception ensures alignment with objectives and prevents unforeseen issues during development.*

Scenario 3:
A mistake commonly observed is initiating VR project planning without involving SMEs and key decision-makers. This hasty approach leads to misaligned expectations, scope creep, and increased development timelines. Conversely, optimal practices involve early collaboration, incorporating insights from SMEs to create a comprehensive VR development plan that delivers effective training outcomes.

4. Oversight of User Experience and Feedback Integration

In the realm of VR training design, one prevalent mistake revolves around neglecting user experience considerations and overlooking the integration of user feedback. Often, the primary focus remains on content creation, side-lining the crucial aspect of adapting to user perspectives and incorporating their evolving needs.

User engagement suffers when VR training lacks a thoughtful and seamless user experience. Additionally, failing to embed mechanisms for user feedback within the VR environment prevents the crucial loop of continuous improvement and personalisation. If the virtual program is not intuitive to use or navigate, you will struggle with learner adoption.

Scenario 4:
Consider a scenario where a VR training program is built around technical skills, disregarding the comfort and preferences of users within the VR space. The best practices entail a continual feedback loop, refining VR interactions, and optimising the interface for an intuitive and enjoyable experience. This ongoing refinement process enhances engagement and knowledge retention among trainees, fostering a more effective learning environment.


By steering clear of these pitfalls and embracing best practices, organisations can harness the true potential of VR training. Implementing clear learning objectives, adapting content purposefully, fostering collaboration, and prioritising user experience and feedback integration throughout the development process paves the way for impactful and successful training initiatives. Ultimately, these strategies drive tangible improvements in skill acquisition and performance enhancement within organisations adopting VR as a training tool.

Skip to content